Conventional automationWorkflow guide · not independently tested

Run clash and issue coordination in one BIM platform instead of email

BIM collaboration platforms combine models and sheets, track issues and push them back to authoring tools.

BIM Coordinator · BIM · Revizto

Content updated · Tool links listed below; vendor features and pricing change, so confirm with the vendor

Short answer

BIM collaboration platforms combine models and sheets, track issues and push them back to authoring tools. Start here: combine the discipline models in one coordination file. Keep a person in the loop: Clash tools flag geometry, not constructability. Coordinators still judge every issue.

The problem

Run clash and issue coordination without endless email. This is a common, time-consuming task for a bim coordinator.

What this workflow does

BIM collaboration platforms combine models and sheets, track issues and push them back to authoring tools.

How it works: Rules or specialist software perform the task. No AI agent is required.

Your checkpoint: Clash tools flag geometry, not constructability. Coordinators still judge every issue.

Before you start

  • Access to the named tool; confirm license, version and cost with the vendor.
  • A small, non-confidential sample to try the workflow on first.
  • A qualified person to review the output before it is used.

Tools and access

Follow the steps

  1. Combine the discipline models in one coordination file.
  2. Run clash tests by system pair (structure vs. ductwork first).
  3. Assign issues to owners with due dates.
  4. Review open issues weekly in the coordination meeting.

Try a small example

Replace the bracketed fields with your own project details. No tested sample run is published for this workflow yet.

Sample input

Fill in the bracketed [fields] in the text below with your project data.

Manual setup checklist

Group these clash results by level and system, and rank by likely field impact. Flag duplicates: [paste clash report]

Expected output

Not published yet. Treat any output as a draft and check it against the source documents.

Check the result

  • Every value, citation or quantity traces back to a source document.
  • Missing information is marked as missing, not filled in.

Limits and recovery

  • Clash tools flag geometry, not constructability. Coordinators still judge every issue.
  • Check your organization’s data policy before sharing project files with third-party tools.

Stop or switch when: The source cannot be verified, permissions are missing, or the result contains unsupported facts.

Frequently asked questions

How do I run clash and issue coordination in one BIM platform instead of email?

Combine the discipline models in one coordination file. Run clash tests by system pair (structure vs. ductwork first). Assign issues to owners with due dates. The full step list is above.

Does this use an AI agent or regular software?

It is labeled Conventional automation: Rules or specialist software perform the task. No AI agent is required.

What tools do I need?

Revizto. Confirm license, version and cost with the vendor, and try it on a small non-confidential sample first.

Can I use the output without checking it?

No. Clash tools flag geometry, not constructability. Coordinators still judge every issue.

Has this workflow been tested?

Workflow guide · not independently tested. It is written from vendor documentation and practitioner use.

Evidence and maintenance

Written from vendor documentation and practitioner use. Labels apply to the steps described here, not every feature of a product. Links were checked when the page was written.

Know what does the work.

Agent executes
An AI agent calls connected tools to carry out bounded actions. You set permissions and review the result.
AI assists
AI drafts or analyzes. A person operates the tools, checks the work, and takes action.
Conventional automation
Rules or specialist software perform the task. No AI agent is required.